[Eg6_analysis] [Lowq] Meeting tomorrow
Stepan Stepanyan
stepanya at jlab.org
Fri Dec 17 12:55:30 EST 2010
Hi Lamiaa,
I was thinking to name this pass1-v1 and process all the files of all
good runs.
We should have fixed, stable version of the code (may have different
outputs
for 1.2 GeV and for higher energy runs). We should have stable calibration
constants (may be some difference for 1.2 GeV and for higher energy runs).
Let me know what do you think, please every one.
Regards, Stepan
On 12/16/10 2:05 PM, Lamiaa El Fassi wrote:
> Hi Stepan,
>
> Okay, I will keep then the full list of banks as pass0_v1 cooking.
> But, I will add to it
> the TPCC calibration bank
>
> Since the cooking will include only the 1.2 GeV runs, maybe it's
> better to call it
> elastic_v1, gem_v1 or pass0_gv1. What do you think?
>
> Best,
>
> Lamiaa
>
> ************************************************************
> * Lamiaa El Fassi email: elfassi at jlab.org
> <mailto:elfassi at jlab.org>
> * Research Associate @ Rutgers University
> * Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703
> * Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
> * Suite# 4, MS 12H3
> * Newport News, VA. 23606
> ************************************************************
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Stepan Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org
> <mailto:stepanya at jlab.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi Lamiaa,
>
> Please cook everything A** and B** files. Week of cooking seems just
> on time before holidays.
> I assume you are talking about IC reconstruction banks. If we keep IC
> information I would prefer to have hodoscope's reconstruction banks
> as well, SCHB and SCPB.
>
> One question, what you will name this pass, Pass0_v2?
>
> Stepan
>
> On 12/16/10 9:42 AM, Lamiaa El Fassi wrote:
>> Hi Stepan,
>>
>> For the software, I will leave the two outputs [1] & [3] combined
>> for this cooking too.
>> However, I will add the helicity modification when Raffaella is
>> done with it.
>>
>> As for 1.2 GeV runs, we have two run periods. First from 61216
>> till 61482 with
>> 109 production runs. Second set is from 61931 till 61966 with 25
>> production runs.
>> So, a total of 134 runs will be processed. Those run numbers is
>> based on the list
>> of good runs study that I did after the pass0_v1 cooking. Some of
>> these runs are
>> very long. They contain more than hundred files which means A*
>> and B* extension
>> on the raw data. Until now I am processing just the A extension,
>> shall I add the B files
>> also to this cooking? I can expect that this cooking will be done
>> in maximum one week
>> depends on how much Auger will be busy in this period?
>>
>> As for the output files, usually I am producing just the SEB NT10
>> ntuple and the BOS
>> files when I am cooking to Raphael. But in case some other people
>> might be interested
>> to analyse these data, I may produce the full list of output files:
>> - ROOT files: CLASTOOL & H2ROOT root ntuples.
>> - SEB Nt10 ntuple.
>> - BOS files
>> - ANAHIST hbook file
>> - Helicity correction file
>> - LOG files
>> I will manage to save the SEB ntuple in the claseg6 work disk and
>> copy all others files to
>> the auto-managed work disk but they will be linked to the claseg6
>> work disk. I will leave the
>> IC banks active on those outputs but if there is no objection I
>> may turn off the hodoscope
>> banks.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Lamiaa
>>
>> ************************************************************
>> * Lamiaa El Fassi email: elfassi at jlab.org
>> <mailto:elfassi at jlab.org>
>> * Research Associate @ Rutgers University
>> * Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703
>> * Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
>> * Suite# 4, MS 12H3
>> * Newport News, VA. 23606
>> ************************************************************
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Stepan Stepanyan
>> <stepanya at jlab.org <mailto:stepanya at jlab.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Lamiaa,
>>
>> You can leave changes for DC as they are, no problem.
>> For 1.2 GeV one output [1] will be enough. But if you
>> do not want to touch the code you can leave as it is
>> [1] and [3]. Since this is again mostly for Raphael for
>> the RTPC calibration, we do not want to select events
>> with restriction on a track in RTPC.
>>
>> How long the cooking of 1.2 GeV takes, all the files of
>> all good runs.
>>
>> Thanks, Stepan
>>
>> On 12/15/10 2:46 AM, Lamiaa El Fassi wrote:
>>> Hi Stepan,
>>>
>>> Up to now, user_ana codes are up-to-date since we didn't do
>>> any changes since
>>> the previous cooking except the DC initial fit parameters
>>> that I changed to make
>>> them similar to dc3. Shall I leave them like that?
>>> In the previous cooking we decided to combine
>>> - [1] a negatively charged TB track
>>> - [3] a positively charged track with at least 2 neutrals
>>> (in any EC - IC combinations)
>>> in the produced bos file. We turned off the other two outputs:
>>> - [2] a good electron and a positively charged particle (I
>>> made a change)
>>> - [4] at least 1 track in RTPC and at least 2 neutrals in
>>> (any EC - IC combinations)
>>>
>>> I think last cooking choice is okay for the RTPC calibration
>>> since I already used it on
>>> some cooking for Raphael, unless you may want to add the
>>> RTPC track to this
>>> cooking outputs. Please let me know which output
>>> configuration shall we use in this
>>> cooking.
>>>
>>> I will wait for the new helicity modification by Raffaella
>>> to implement it into our
>>> cooking packages. She already contacted me to get the tcl
>>> file to run some test
>>> after the helicity modification that she did to her cooking
>>> codes version.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Lamiaa
>>>
>>>
>>> ************************************************************
>>> * Lamiaa El Fassi email: elfassi at jlab.org
>>> <mailto:elfassi at jlab.org>
>>> * Research Associate @ Rutgers University
>>> * Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703
>>> * Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
>>> * Suite# 4, MS 12H3
>>> * Newport News, VA. 23606
>>> ************************************************************
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Stepan Stepanyan
>>> <stepanya at jlab.org <mailto:stepanya at jlab.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Lamiaa,
>>>
>>> On the meeting today we decided to not wait for IC
>>> calibration
>>> and cook 1.2 GeV for Raphael for RTPC work. What we need to
>>> do is to make sure code is up to date. Raffaella
>>> mentioned that
>>> she can add helicity calculations into it within this
>>> week. For
>>> 1.2 GeV we do not need any output but electron events.
>>> Let's work towards having everything ready for 1.2 GeV
>>> cooking,
>>> all of the good runs, by the end of the week. Let me
>>> know what
>>> we are missing and what we need to accomplish this goal.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Stepan
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/13/10 9:49 PM, Lamiaa El Fassi wrote:
>>>> Hi Stepan,
>>>>
>>>> Sure we can talk about that whenever you want. Please
>>>> let me know when
>>>> it's convenient for you and I will call you.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Lamiaa
>>>>
>>>> ************************************************************
>>>> * Lamiaa El Fassi email: elfassi at jlab.org
>>>> <mailto:elfassi at jlab.org>
>>>> * Research Associate @ Rutgers University
>>>> * Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703
>>>> * Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
>>>> * Suite# 4, MS 12H3
>>>> * Newport News, VA. 23606
>>>> ************************************************************
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Stepan Stepanyan
>>>> <stepanya at jlab.org <mailto:stepanya at jlab.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Lamiaa,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the email. Sorry we did not cross today.
>>>> I am
>>>> on "vacation" but I come for few meetings.
>>>>
>>>> One thing I wanted to talk to you is the
>>>> preparation of the
>>>> software for the next cooking, including outputs. I
>>>> guess
>>>> we can do it offline.
>>>>
>>>> Have a safe flight.
>>>>
>>>> Stepan
>>>>
>>>> On 12/13/10 6:10 PM, Lamiaa El Fassi wrote:
>>>>> Hi Stepan,
>>>>>
>>>>> I was willing to stop by to talk to you today but
>>>>> I didn't have a chance to do so and it seems you
>>>>> are on vacation. I am leaving tomorrow morning and
>>>>> I am not able to attend the meeting since my
>>>>> flight is on the same meeting time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Lamiaa
>>>>>
>>>>> */Sent from my MOTOBLUR™ smartphone on AT&T/*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original message-----
>>>>>
>>>>> *From: *Stepan Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org>
>>>>> <mailto:stepanya at jlab.org>*
>>>>> To: *eg6_analysis at jlab.org
>>>>> <mailto:eg6_analysis at jlab.org>, lowq at jlab.org
>>>>> <mailto:lowq at jlab.org>*
>>>>> Sent: *Mon, Dec 13, 2010 16:50:34 GMT+00:00*
>>>>> Subject: *[Lowq] Meeting tomorrow
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>
>>>>> We will have eg6 meeting tomorrow Tuesday,
>>>>> December 14, at 9:30am
>>>>> in room B101.
>>>>> Agenda items can be found at -
>>>>> http://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/lowq/wiki/index.php/Meeting_on_December_14_at_9:30am
>>>>>
>>>>> Calling instructions can be found at :
>>>>> http://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/lowq/wiki/index.php/Agendas_and_Minutes_of_the_meetings
>>>>>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards, Stepan
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Lowq mailing list
>>>>> Lowq at jlab.org <mailto:Lowq at jlab.org>
>>>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/lowq
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/eg6_analysis/attachments/20101217/64862eef/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Eg6_analysis
mailing list