[Eg6_analysis] [Lowq] Meeting tomorrow

Fri Dec 17 13:49:51 EST 2010

Hi Stepan,

Just yesterday Seema mentioned offline to me to recook for her the 11
calibration runs for
one more/last DC iteration in order to compare the new DC results with the
user_ana fits results
after the modification that I did recently to the DC fit function. So, after
implementing the helicity modification by Raffaella and using the new RTPC
pads files extracted recently by Raphael,
I was thinking to process her jobs first as a test, and then process the 1.2
GeV data (until now
I was thinking just about the elastic good runs not the full data set).
Since we have now two files
of the hot pads I need to modify my cooking scripts to take that into
account. Historically,
Bonus people are keeping all the pads info in ASCII files not on database
like the other CLAS subsystems. Those files must be submitted with each job
otherwise it will crash. These new calibration files will split our data set
into two ranges before and after a run 61482 taken on
11/01/2009 and it must named as "badPads.dat" (as it's labelled inside the
GEM codes).
What I am wondering about if two runs before/after a run 61482 are processed
in the same
farm machine, and in case I am copying their appropriate hot pads files into
"badPads.dat",
those files won't overwrite each others. I think saving a disk space for
each job may save
also their own files from being overwritten, is that right?

As for the cooking pass name, if you want to move to Pass1, we can call it
Pass1_v0 and so
on. What do you think? But we may start first with 1.2 GeV and when it's
done we can process
the other data set in order to remove the TPCC bank from it, is that right?

Best regards,

Lamiaa

************************************************************
*  Lamiaa El Fassi             email: elfassi at jlab.org
*  Research Associate @ Rutgers University
*  Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703
*  Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
*  Suite# 4, MS 12H3
*  Newport News, VA. 23606
************************************************************

On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Stepan Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org>wrote:

>  Hi Lamiaa,
>
> I was thinking to name this pass1-v1 and process all the files of all good
> runs.
> We should have fixed, stable version of the code (may have different
> outputs
> for 1.2 GeV and for higher energy runs). We should have stable calibration
> constants (may be some difference for 1.2 GeV and for higher energy runs).
>
> Let me know what do you think, please every one.
>
> Regards, Stepan
>
> On 12/16/10 2:05 PM, Lamiaa El Fassi wrote:
>
> Hi Stepan,
>
> Okay, I will keep then the full list of banks as pass0_v1 cooking. But, I
> will add to it
> the TPCC calibration bank
>
> Since the cooking will include only the 1.2 GeV runs, maybe it's better to
> call it
> elastic_v1, gem_v1 or pass0_gv1. What do you think?
>
> Best,
>
> Lamiaa
>
> ************************************************************
> *  Lamiaa El Fassi             email: elfassi at jlab.org
> *  Research Associate @ Rutgers University
> *  Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703
> *  Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
> *  Suite# 4, MS 12H3
> *  Newport News, VA. 23606
> ************************************************************
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Stepan Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org>
> wrote:
>
>>  Hi Lamiaa,
>>
>> Please cook everything A** and B** files. Week of cooking seems just
>> on time before holidays.
>> I assume you are talking about IC reconstruction banks. If we keep IC
>> information I would prefer to have hodoscope's reconstruction banks
>> as well, SCHB and SCPB.
>>
>> One question, what you will name this pass, Pass0_v2?
>>
>> Stepan
>>
>> On 12/16/10 9:42 AM, Lamiaa El Fassi wrote:
>>
>> Hi Stepan,
>>
>> For the software, I will leave the two outputs [1] & [3] combined for this
>> cooking too.
>> However, I will add the helicity modification when Raffaella is done with
>> it.
>>
>> As for 1.2 GeV runs, we have two run periods. First from 61216 till 61482
>> with
>> 109 production runs. Second set is from 61931 till 61966 with 25
>> production runs.
>> So, a total of 134 runs will be processed. Those run numbers is based on
>> the list
>> of good runs study that I did after the pass0_v1 cooking. Some of these
>> runs are
>> very long. They contain more than hundred files which means A* and B*
>> extension
>> on the raw data. Until now I am processing just the A extension, shall I
>> add the B files
>> also to this cooking? I can expect that this cooking will be done in
>> maximum one week
>> depends on how much Auger will be busy in this period?
>>
>> As for the output files, usually I am producing just the SEB NT10 ntuple
>> and the BOS
>> files when I am cooking to Raphael. But in case some other people might be
>> interested
>> to analyse these data, I may produce the full list of output files:
>>   - ROOT files: CLASTOOL & H2ROOT root ntuples.
>>   - SEB Nt10 ntuple.
>>   - BOS files
>>   - ANAHIST hbook file
>>   - Helicity correction file
>>   - LOG files
>> I will manage to save the SEB ntuple in the claseg6 work disk and copy all
>> others files to
>> the auto-managed work disk but they will be linked to the claseg6 work
>> disk. I will leave the
>> IC banks active on those outputs but if there is no objection I may turn
>> off the hodoscope
>> banks.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Lamiaa
>>
>> ************************************************************
>> *  Lamiaa El Fassi             email: elfassi at jlab.org
>> *  Research Associate @ Rutgers University
>> *  Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703
>> *  Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
>> *  Suite# 4, MS 12H3
>> *  Newport News, VA. 23606
>> ************************************************************
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Stepan Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>  Hi Lamiaa,
>>>
>>> You can leave changes for DC as they are, no problem.
>>> For 1.2 GeV one output [1] will be enough. But if you
>>> do not want to touch the code you can leave as it is
>>> [1] and [3]. Since this is again mostly for Raphael for
>>> the RTPC calibration, we do not want to select events
>>> with restriction on a track in RTPC.
>>>
>>> How long the cooking of 1.2 GeV takes, all the files of
>>> all good runs.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Stepan
>>>
>>> On 12/15/10 2:46 AM, Lamiaa El Fassi wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Stepan,
>>>
>>> Up to now, user_ana codes are up-to-date since we didn't do any changes
>>> since
>>> the previous cooking except the DC initial fit parameters that I changed
>>> to make
>>> them similar to dc3. Shall I leave them like that?
>>> In the previous cooking we decided to combine
>>> - [1] a negatively charged TB track
>>> - [3] a positively charged track with at least 2 neutrals (in any EC - IC
>>> combinations)
>>> in the produced bos file. We turned off the other two outputs:
>>> - [2] a good electron and a positively charged particle (I made a change)
>>> - [4] at least 1 track in RTPC and at least 2 neutrals in  (any EC - IC
>>> combinations)
>>>
>>> I think last cooking choice is okay for the RTPC calibration since I
>>> already used it on
>>> some cooking for Raphael, unless you may want to add the RTPC track to
>>> this
>>> cooking outputs. Please let me know which output configuration shall we
>>> use in this
>>> cooking.
>>>
>>> I will wait for the new helicity modification by Raffaella to implement
>>> it into our
>>> cooking packages. She already contacted me to get the tcl file to run
>>> some test
>>> after the helicity modification that she did to her cooking codes
>>> version.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Lamiaa
>>>
>>>
>>> ************************************************************
>>> *  Lamiaa El Fassi             email: elfassi at jlab.org
>>> *  Research Associate @ Rutgers University
>>> *  Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703
>>> *  Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
>>> *  Suite# 4, MS 12H3
>>> *  Newport News, VA. 23606
>>> ************************************************************
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Stepan Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Hi Lamiaa,
>>>>
>>>> On the meeting today we decided to not wait for IC calibration
>>>> and cook 1.2 GeV for Raphael for RTPC work. What we need to
>>>> do is to make sure code is up to date. Raffaella mentioned that
>>>> she can add helicity calculations into it within this week. For
>>>> 1.2 GeV we do not need any output but electron events.
>>>> Let's work towards having everything ready for 1.2 GeV cooking,
>>>> all of the good runs, by the end of the week. Let me know what
>>>> we are missing and what we need to accomplish this goal.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Stepan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/13/10 9:49 PM, Lamiaa El Fassi wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Stepan,
>>>>
>>>> Sure we can talk about that whenever you want. Please let me know when
>>>> it's convenient for you and I will call you.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Lamiaa
>>>>
>>>> ************************************************************
>>>> *  Lamiaa El Fassi             email: elfassi at jlab.org
>>>> *  Research Associate @ Rutgers University
>>>> *  Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703
>>>> *  Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
>>>> *  Suite# 4, MS 12H3
>>>> *  Newport News, VA. 23606
>>>> ************************************************************
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Stepan Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  Hi Lamiaa,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the email. Sorry we did not cross today. I am
>>>>> on "vacation" but I come for few meetings.
>>>>>
>>>>> One thing I wanted to talk to you is the preparation of the
>>>>> software for the next cooking, including outputs. I guess
>>>>> we can do it offline.
>>>>>
>>>>> Have a safe flight.
>>>>>
>>>>> Stepan
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/13/10 6:10 PM, Lamiaa El Fassi wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Stepan,
>>>>>
>>>>> I was willing to stop by to talk to you today but I didn't have a
>>>>> chance to do so and it seems you are on vacation. I am leaving tomorrow
>>>>> morning and I am not able to attend the meeting since my flight is on the
>>>>> same meeting time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Lamiaa
>>>>>
>>>>> *Sent from my MOTOBLUR™ smartphone on AT&T*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original message-----
>>>>>
>>>>> *From: *Stepan Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org> <stepanya at jlab.org>*
>>>>> To: *eg6_analysis at jlab.org, lowq at jlab.org*
>>>>> Sent: *Mon, Dec 13, 2010 16:50:34 GMT+00:00*
>>>>> Subject: *[Lowq] Meeting tomorrow
>>>>>
>>>>>  Dear all,
>>>>>
>>>>> We will have eg6 meeting tomorrow Tuesday, December 14, at 9:30am
>>>>> in room B101.
>>>>> Agenda items can be found at -
>>>>>
>>>>> http://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/lowq/wiki/index.php/Meeting_on_December_14_at_9:30am
>>>>>
>>>>> Calling instructions can be found at :
>>>>>
>>>>> http://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/lowq/wiki/index.php/Agendas_and_Minutes_of_the_meetings
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards, Stepan
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Lowq mailing list
>>>>> Lowq at jlab.org
>>>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/lowq
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/eg6_analysis/attachments/20101217/8c16cbc7/attachment-0001.html 