[Eg6_analysis] Calibration cooking

[Mohammad Hattawy]

Hello all,
   So, we all agree that HROOT output files will be enough, and we do not
need BOS files.
Lamiaa, you can go with the cooking if this is fine.

Regards,
Mohammad.


On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Nathan Baltzell <baltzell at anl.gov> wrote:

> **
> Hello Mohammad,
>
> HROOT with TPCC will have all raw info about all hits in all reconstructed
> tracks.  Lamiaa's tcl that was attached does have the "ltpcc_nt_do" flag,
> which will turn on the TPCC variables in the ntuple.
>
> -nathan
>
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 02:58:48 -0500, Mohammad Hattawy <
> mohammad.hattawy at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Lamiaa,
>
>    For the run lists, we need all the 1.2 GeV runs with 4He target, and
> the first file of each run of 5.7 GeV and 6 GeV. If it is easier for you to
> pick a fixed number of statistics from each run, I would say we need the
> first 400 000 events from all the 6  and 5.7 GeV.
>   Regarding the output files, I would say that HROOT is enough. Nathan, do
> we need BOS files also?
>   For the tcl file, i think it is fine.
>
> Best regards,
> Mohammad.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Lamiaa El Fassi <lamiomar at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Raphael,
>>
>> In case the information that you need is included in the TPCC bank, as
>> Nathan mentioned,
>> I may need to process few runs for you since the TPCC, which is a
>> calibration bank, was not
>> turned on in the pass1v1 production pass. For this task I am suggesting
>> the following:
>>
>> 1. Could you check different beam energy run lists posted in the cooking
>> link (here<https://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/lowq/wiki/index.php/Cooking_Notes>)
>> and pick
>> the runs that you want me to process? Please specify also how much
>> statistics you may need
>> for each run!
>> 2. Could you specify also the type of output files that you need; BOS or
>> HROOT files or both?
>> In this case I will save the output files only on Volatile disk not on
>> Silo.
>> 3. Could you check the attached tcl file which I am usually using for the
>> RTPC calibration to see
>> if all what you need for this RTPC calibration check is included?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Lamiaa
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Nathan Baltzell <baltzell at anl.gov> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Raphaël,
>>>
>>> Yes, I think the TPCC bank should be sufficient.  It has TDCs, raw ADCs,
>>> and also gain-calibrated ADCs for every hit used in the GCPB bank, which
>>> has some very loose cuts to remove junk tracks.  Each TPCC hit has a
>>> pointer to the GCPB track it was associated with.  That raw information
>>> cannot be gotten from only cooked pass1v1 data.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Nathan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:57:52 -0500, Dupré Raphaël <
>>> raphael.dupre at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Dear Lamiaa and Nathan,
>>>>
>>>> We are starting to work again on the RTPC calibration. One of the
>>>> points that we would like to check is that the calibration is not
>>>> changing during the run.
>>>>
>>>> We would need the detailed tpc bank which includes (raw adc, tdc, ...)
>>>> for all the 1.2 GeV runs, and the first file of all the 5.7 and 6 GeV
>>>> runs.
>>>>
>>>> My first question to Nathan, does the TPCC bank information is good
>>>> for this and does it provides raw ADC? (raw ADC are for other tests
>>>> later, but we will eventually need them too) Else, what should we use?
>>>>
>>>> Then could Lamiaa cook the runs mentionned above? or maybe they can be
>>>> extracted from BOS files from the pass1v1 cooking?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Raphaël Dupré
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Mohammad Hattawy.
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Best regards,
Mohammad Hattawy.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/eg6_analysis/attachments/20130711/0a1df54c/attachment-0001.html