[Halld-physics] Monitoring Launch 2025-01 ver13

[Sean Dobbs]

Hi Beni,

Thanks for checking this out. The ECAL offsets were corrected after this
monitoring launch and some spot checks show good alignment after that. So
the next monitoring launch should show better results. Hopefully the
effects that Simon is looking at will be smaller scale.

Cheers
Sean

On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 10:25 AM Simon Taylor via Halld-physics <
halld-physics at jlab.org> wrote:

> Hi, all.
>
> I am working on the ECAL library to see if I can find issues with the
> shower timing.   Based on the recent change to HDGeant4 I already need to
> add a light propagation correction to the reconstruction.
>
> Simon
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Halld-physics <halld-physics-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of
> zihlmann via Halld-physics <halld-physics at jlab.org>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 26, 2025 10:05 AM
> *To:* halld-physics at jlab.org <halld-physics at jlab.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Halld-physics] Monitoring Launch 2025-01 ver13
>
> On more issue that Simon pointed out to me.
> The ECAL timing is way off for all runs. It is around 6.6ns
> this is so far off that it barely fits into the monitoring histogram.
> I looked at two separate histograms and both yield the same result
> of a big offset:
> "HLDetectorTiming/Physics Triggers/TRACKING/ECAL - RF Time
> and:
> Independent/Hist_Neutrals/ECALNeutralShowerDeltaTVsE
>
> At this point I have no idea why the ECAL is so off.
>
> Beni
>
> On 11/26/25 08:37, zihlmann wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> there are two runs where something did not go as planed.
> 132705 and 133564, both these runs have hardly any statistics in the root
> files (at least the histogram
> I was looking at). However, both these runs are are over 1h long and have
> plenty of triggers.
>
> cheers,
> Beni
>
> On 11/8/25 13:13, Alexander Austregesilo via Halld-physics wrote:
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> We completed another full monitoring launch for the 2025-01 GlueX-II data
> set. We successfully reconstructed 5 files for all 1197 runs with the RCDB
> query "@is_dirc_production and status!=0", for the first time with the
> correct material maps.
>
> The usual monitoring plots can be found on the new PlotBrowser page:
>
>
> https://halldweb.jlab.org/PlotGrader/browser_dev.html?minRunNum=131593&maxRunNum=133606&RunPeriod=RunPeriod-2025-01&Version=mon_ver13
> <https://halldweb.jlab.org/PlotGrader/browser_dev.html?minRunNum=131593&maxRunNum=133606&RunPeriod=RunPeriod-2025-01&Version=mon_ver12>
>
> All merged histogram files can be found on the work disk at:
> */work/halld/data_monitoring/RunPeriod-2025-01/mon_ver13/rootfiles/*
>
> The REST files, trigger skims and several root trees, including PART trees
> for pi0, rho, omega and KLambda, are saved on cache:
> */cache/halld/offline_monitoring/RunPeriod-2025-01/ver13/*
>
> Best regards,
>
> Alex
>
>
> --
> Alexander Austregesilo
>
> Staff Scientist - Experimental Nuclear Physics
> Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
> Newport News, VAaaustreg at jlab.org
> (757) 269-6982
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Halld-physics mailing listHalld-physics at jlab.orghttps://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-physics
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Halld-physics mailing list
> Halld-physics at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-physics
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-physics/attachments/20251126/4255caee/attachment.htm>