[Halld-pid-upgrade] mirror reflectivity
Jochen Schwiening
J.Schwiening at gsi.de
Thu Feb 14 10:15:45 EST 2019
Hi Maria,
we should definitely keep the reflectivity for the mirrors at the far
end of the bars as we had it originally. Those values were measured by
Jerry 20+ years ago and look different enough from the new optical box
mirrors to possibly make a (small) difference.
Thanks,
Joe
On 2/13/2019 23:27, Maria Patsyuk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I pushed the new reflectivity.
> As a side effect, now the far-end mirror on each radiator has the
> reflectivity, which John measured.
> Maybe we should keep the initial reflectivity for the far end mirror?
>
> Best regards,
> Maria
>
>> On Feb 13, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Maria Patsyuk <mpatsyuk at mit.edu
>> <mailto:mpatsyuk at mit.edu>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> attached is the mirror reflectivity I’m going to put in the geometry
>> and the data present in hdds currently (for comparison).
>> John was able to measure the mirror reflectivity in the range [325,
>> 600] nm. I extrapolated linearly the reflectivity in [250, 320] nm and
>> above 600 nm to have the same wavelength range as it was for the
>> current reflectivity.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Maria
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Halld-pid-upgrade mailing list
>> Halld-pid-upgrade at jlab.org <mailto:Halld-pid-upgrade at jlab.org>
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-pid-upgrade
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Halld-pid-upgrade mailing list
> Halld-pid-upgrade at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-pid-upgrade
>
More information about the Halld-pid-upgrade
mailing list