[Halld-tagger] position of tagger quadrupole?

[Alexander Somov]

Thanks a lot Tim,

Cheers,
       Alex



On Fri, 5 Feb 2016, Timothy Whitlatch wrote:

> Here is the current actuals from the survey group; These are in machine coordinates. I will translate and update my spreadsheet next week.
>
>
>
> MQPAD00 QUAD
>
> Mechanical 300.16470 80.60000 104.70000 (ideal)
>
> Mechanical 300.16491 80.60002 104.69962 (found)
>
> Yaw Pitch Roll 0.01003 0.02636 -0.01003 (found)
>
>
> Tim Whitlatch
> Hall D Engineer
> Jefferson Lab
> 600 KELVIN DR STE 5
> Newport News, VA 23606-4468
> 757-269-5087
>
>
> From: "Alexander Somov" <somov at jlab.org>
> To: "Alexandre Deur" <deurpam at jlab.org>
> Cc: "Timothy Whitlatch" <whitey at jlab.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 11:08:13 AM
> Subject: Re: Fwd: [Halld-tagger] position of tagger quadrupole?
>
> Hi,
>
> We'll need to get the actual quad positions from the alignment
> group. I don't have them.
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
>
>
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2016, Alexandre Deur wrote:
>
>> Hello Tim,
>>
>> Is that a request you can take care of?
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Alexandre
>>
>> ----- Forwarded Message -----
>>> From: "Daniel Sober" <sober at cua.edu>
>>> To: "Hall D beam working group" <halld-tagger at jlab.org>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 4:56:52 PM
>>> Subject: [Halld-tagger] position of tagger quadrupole?
>>
>>> I have found Yang's Tosca-calculated map for the quadrupole. The effective
>>> length is about 32 cm, and the field values extend to a radius of 2 cm. Is that
>>> consistent with the installed device?
>>> Can someone send me the installed position, so I can start using it in
>>> raytracing?
>>> Dan
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Halld-tagger mailing list
>>> Halld-tagger at jlab.org
>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-tagger
>>
>