[Halld-tagger] [EXTERNAL] beamline meeting on Monday cancelled

[Alexander Somov]

Hello Richard and All,

The easiest solution for the TPOL is to scale the read out, i.e.,
to use 4 fadcs instead of 2 (I've already installed these fadcs
some time ago, but they are currently not used). This should reduce
the dead time by a factor of two.

Another thing which we need to discuss with Mike is whether we
can decrease the TPOL window size to 100 samples (400 ns). Currently,
the window size is 150 samples.

At any rate, the TPOL seems not to be a showstopper.

Happy holidays !

Cheers,
            Sasha







________________________________
From: Halld-tagger <halld-tagger-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of Richard Jones <richard.t.jones at uconn.edu>
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 11:43 AM
To: Hall D beam working group <halld-tagger at jlab.org>
Subject: [Halld-tagger] [EXTERNAL] beamline meeting on Monday cancelled

Hello Beamers,

In view of the end of the run, and that in the end none of the planned work related to the beam got done, I propose that we skip Monday's meeting, and wait until after the new year to meet again. Issues related to beamline hardware that have been discussed over the past couple of weeks include

  *   ability to run hysteresis loop on the PS magnet
  *   ability to read out the TPOL at high rate, decreasing the width of the readout window

On issue #1, I don't see how our group can contribute much, this is a magnet power supply and cooling problem. I assume this is in good hands. On issue #2, I would like to ask if Michael and Sasha can hammer out an agreement on this between them, and get back telling us what they have decided. If there are other things to discuss before the new year, please raise them on this list by email.

Happy holidays to everyone!
-Richard Jones
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-tagger/attachments/20191220/838d191b/attachment.html>