[Isotope-prod] Experiment in the injector
Pavel Degtiarenko
pavel at jlab.org
Mon Mar 13 13:50:39 EDT 2017
Kevin had purchased a reasonably big jar of natural gallium. We should
still have the irradiated targets for re-use; all residual activities in
them are expected to be negligible by now. We should keep the current
limit as it was before, to make the approval process easier. For the
beam time estimate it would be good to hear from VCU about the range of
Cu-67 activity that is best for their studies, and see if we can make it
(including shipping arrangements). Better knowledge of beam energy and
position is important. I would consider a request for the line
modification if needed to make these measurements reliable.
Best regards,
Pavel
On 3/13/2017 1:20 PM, Hari Areti wrote:
>
> I am going to ask Ops for time at the injector for irradiating Gallium.
>
> Let is fix a few things and work out the logistics.
>
> Requisites:
> Do we have enough target material? (PD, GK)
> Do we have BNNT holders? (KJ)
>
> Beam parameters
>
> 1. Beam Energy 18.5 MeV
> 2. Beam current ?
> 3. Beam time?
>
> Logistics
>
> Test plan ( revive the previous one, if we had one)
> Do we have the means to measure energy and beam size? (I will check)
> Assuming that VCU collaborators have time, how do we ship the
> irradiated sample?
>
> Anything else?
>
> Once our thoughts are organized, should we meet (even on the phone)
> for a few minutes to organize the experiment?
>
> Thanks.
>
> -H
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Isotope-prod mailing list
> Isotope-prod at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/isotope-prod
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/isotope-prod/attachments/20170313/610bb030/attachment.html>
More information about the Isotope-prod
mailing list