[Mott] 2/16/16 Meeting Analysis Follow-Up

[Daniel Moser]

https://wiki.jlab.org/ciswiki/index.php/02/16/16_Meeting_Analysis_Follow-Up 

All, 

The above link will take you to the ciswiki->CEBAF Mott Polarimeter->Analysis Campaigns->Mott Publication Working Area->2/16/16 Meeting Analysis Follow Up 

where you will find 

1) An examination of three Pade fit forms -- (0,1) the previous "best" form; (2,0); and (1,1), the new, simulation-driven best fit form -- and how they change when dropping the thickest foils one-by-one. Run II data, old FESEM thickness data, although it shouldn't change the answer dramatically. 

2) An examination of how our new, simulation-driven best fit -- A(t) = (A_0 + b * t) / (1 + c * t) -- parameters vary versus half-sigma, from -4 to +4 sigma, slices. Run II data, using the most up-to-date FESEM thickness data given at today's meeting. 

Let me know if anyone would like to see anything else. 

Daniel 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/mott/attachments/20160216/148454c7/attachment.html>