[Pansophy] SNS PPU Cold Mass Assembly BOM

[Gary Cheng]

Mike,

I agree that we need to come up with some acronyms and hope that we just 
need 4 acronyms, correspondingly, I will prepare 4 inspection travelers. 
The SOW requires that all kits to be packaged separately and labeled, 
refer to Section 7.4 of the SOW for details. So, when QC is checking a 
certain kit, there shall be a dropdown list of kit numbers.

Are certifications expected for each kit?
--- Yes.

Will each kit be serialized at the vendor? (No need to mark each part, 
just the kit)
---Each kit is assigned a two-digit kit number. Each subassembly within 
a kit is serialized and marked. Vendor documents shall carry S/Ns.

How will the kits be identified? (This will help to figure out an 
appropriate acronym)
---Please refer to SOW's Section 7.4. By the way, we will received 4*7 = 
28 kits.

Besides INV travelers, will the acronyms appear on INSP & ASSY travelers?
--- I think so. INSP travelers will be developed by me. Mark wants me to 
adapt the CMASS ASSY traveler, so, I can cite the Cold Mass Assembly 
Machined Parts acryonym, e.g. CMASMP, in that traveler. Matt is 
responsible to the final assembly traveler. We may advise him to cite 
the acronyms for the other 3 kits in his traveler.

Will INV or INSP be conducting the parts audit for the kits?
--- I think INV would be the better place to count parts inside a kit. 
INV may perform a simple headcount plus quick visual inspection for 
apparent damages.

As I start to write the inspection travelers for these 4 kits, we can 
talk more about what to include in the INSP travelers.

Thanks,
Gary

On 3/24/2020 3:21 PM, Mike Dickey wrote:
> Ed & Gary,
>
> I have a few questions about these kits.  It looks to me that some 
> items in the kits may have certs.  If this is the case then we can 
> come up with acronyms for them.
>
> Are certifications expected for each kit?
> Will each kit be serialized at the vendor? (No need to mark each part, 
> just the kit)
> How will the kits be identified? (This will help to figure out an 
> appropriate acronym)
> Besides INV travelers, will the acronyms appear on INSP & ASSY travelers?
> Will INV or INSP be conducting the parts audit for the kits?
>
> Depending on where the audit is conducted, the INV traveler may need 
> to be modified to include this step.
>
> Mike Dickey
> SRF Inventory Technician
> Jefferson Lab
> 12000 Jefferson Ave
> Newport News, VA 23606
> (757) 269-7755
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Pansophy <pansophy-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of Ed Daly 
> <edaly at jlab.org>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 24, 2020 2:40 PM
> *To:* pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
> *Cc:* Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org>; Matt Marchlik <marchlik at jlab.org>; 
> Katherine Wilson <kwilson at jlab.org>; Mark Wiseman <wiseman at jlab.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Pansophy] SNS PPU Cold Mass Assembly BOM
> Dear Pansophy Team,
> There are 4 kits defined in the cold mass SOW.  How should we format 
> the BoM to indicate that a collection of items make up the kit?  The 
> idea is to reduce the part count for PRIMeS and logistics.  They will 
> need an identifier as well.
>
> What do you think would be best?
>
> Thanks,
> Ed
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 24, 2020 2:26 PM
> *To:* Ed Daly <edaly at jlab.org>; pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
> *Cc:* Katherine Wilson <kwilson at jlab.org>
> *Subject:* Re: SNS PPU Cold Mass Assembly BOM
> Hi Ed and all,
>
> SOW 104211500-M8U-8200-A002, see attached, covers one cold mass assy 
> kit, i.e. the Cold Mass Assembly Machined Parts, 2 final assembly 
> kits, i.e. Final Assembly Supply Piping and Final Assembly Return 
> Piping, and a Guard Vacuum Piping Assembly also used at the final 
> assembly level. I included the final assembly level parts to this SOW 
> because they are similar in nature to the cold mass machined parts. 
> Using one combined SOW makes procurement simpler.
>
> Regards,
> Gary
>
> On 3/24/2020 2:14 PM, Ed Daly wrote:
>> Hi Gary,
>> Wo yao le hen hao!
>>
>> Does the SOW define the names for the kits?  If so, you should 
>> provide these names to Mike,er... the pansophy team. 🙂
>> Thanks,
>> Ed
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org> <mailto:cheng at jlab.org>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 24, 2020 2:10 PM
>> *To:* Ed Daly <edaly at jlab.org> <mailto:edaly at jlab.org>; pansophy 
>> <pansophy at jlab.org> <mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>
>> *Cc:* Katherine Wilson <kwilson at jlab.org> <mailto:kwilson at jlab.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: SNS PPU Cold Mass Assembly BOM
>> Hi Ed,
>>
>> How about this version?
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> On 3/24/2020 2:07 PM, Ed Daly wrote:
>>> Dear Gary,
>>> Why did you remove any kit definitions?
>>> -Ed
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> *From:* Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org> <mailto:cheng at jlab.org>
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 24, 2020 12:22 PM
>>> *To:* pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org> <mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>
>>> *Cc:* Katherine Wilson <kwilson at jlab.org> <mailto:kwilson at jlab.org>; 
>>> Ed Daly <edaly at jlab.org> <mailto:edaly at jlab.org>
>>> *Subject:* SNS PPU Cold Mass Assembly BOM
>>> Hi Mike, Valerie and Megan,
>>>
>>> I have cleaned up the cold mass assy BOM shown this morning. Please 
>>> see attached
>>> Please let me know if you have any questions about this BOM.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Gary
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20200324/96793b98/attachment-0001.html>