[Pansophy] New DocuShare document routing task (Request): SNSPPU-CMA-REC-INSP-R1.docx

Thu Apr 22 09:01:19 EDT 2021

Gary,

I was referring to the highlighted fields in the screenshot below. I assume you intended them to be select boxes, so I added <<SELECT>> to each. As a reminder, the format for a select box is [[FieldName]] {{option1, option2, option3}} <<SELECT>>. The new versions have been routed for approval.

Allen

[cid:image003.png at 01D73754.AAE7AF90]

Allen

From: Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 5:18 PM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: New DocuShare document routing task (Request): SNSPPU-CMA-REC-INSP-R1.docx

Allen,

I uploaded to the Approvals folder because the system permits me to do so :P. Yes, in the future, I will upload to the Ready for Approvals folder instead.
Reading your comments about Step 2's, I think you mean the Cernox S/N fields. There are dropdowns, i.e. the <<DCXUSN>>, for the sensors. The reviewer needs to select from the dropdowns the appropriate S/N according to vendor's records.

[cid:image001.png at 01D7374E.C998F3A0]
[cid:part2.6F6DCCC8.79661EE9 at jlab.org]

Thanks,
Gary
On 4/21/2021 5:10 PM, Allen Samuels wrote:
Gary,

Thank you for the revisions. In the future though, please drop them in the ready for approvals folder. We like to look over revisions ourselves before uploading new versions, and the routing doesn’t change until we change it. It helps us catch any errors or inconsistencies that might have been made. For instance, in step 2 of both revisions, the reviewer fields are missing the input parts. I see the options, but there’s nothing telling me if it’s supposed to be radio buttons, a select dropdown, or what.

Please put in the inputs that you want, then upload to the ready for approval folder. I will put them in as new revisions and route from there.

Allen

From: Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org><mailto:cheng at jlab.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 4:49 PM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org><mailto:samuels at jlab.org>; Larry King <king at jlab.org><mailto:king at jlab.org>
Cc: Peter Owen <powen at jlab.org><mailto:powen at jlab.org>; pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org><mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: New DocuShare document routing task (Request): SNSPPU-CMA-REC-INSP-R1.docx

I incorporated comments from both of you and uploaded new versions of SNSPPU-CMA-SEC-INSP-R3 and SNSPPU-CMA-REC-INSP-R1. It seems that approvals are not reversed.

Thanks,
Gary
On 4/21/2021 3:07 PM, Allen Samuels wrote:
Larry,

Please send emails to the pansophy email address, not just to an individual email like mine. It helps keep us all informed, and allows for someone else to respond if one of us is unavailable.

Allen

From: Larry King <king at jlab.org><mailto:king at jlab.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 2:19 PM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org><mailto:samuels at jlab.org>; Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org><mailto:cheng at jlab.org>
Cc: Peter Owen <powen at jlab.org><mailto:powen at jlab.org>
Subject: RE: New DocuShare document routing task (Request): SNSPPU-CMA-REC-INSP-R1.docx

A few comments for both SEC and REC.  Not sure it’s worth anyone’s time to create another Rev, so I went ahead and signed what’s awaiting signature now.  But if you’re going to be changing the Title anyway…

Should the spreadsheet SNS PPU End Can Cernox Nominal Resistance Values, which is to downloaded, updated, and uploaded, be listed in the References section, rather than the body of Step 3?

End of Step 3 typo says to upload the “sparedsheet.”

For the REC, it would be great if the 10 Cernox serial numbers were arranged as a list or table, in the same order in which they appear on the two connectors being probed.  It would reduce the likelihood of transcription errors.  I’m not sure how it’ll appear to the final user in Pansophy, but there’s a lot of room on page 3 for something like this,

[[TDxx022A]] <<DCXCUSN>>
[[TDxx023A]] <<DCXCUSN>>
[[TDxx024A]] <<DCXCUSN>>
[[TDxx021A]] <<DCXCUSN>>
[[TDxx041A]] <<DCXCUSN>>

[[TDxx022B]] <<DCXCUSN>>
[[TDxx023B]] <<DCXCUSN>>
[[TDxx024B]] <<DCXCUSN>>
[[TDxx021B]] <<DCXCUSN>>
[[TDxx041B]] <<DCXCUSN>>

Instead of jamming it all on the bottom of page 2,
[[TDxx022A]] <<DCXCUSN>>       [[TDxx023A]] <<DCXCUSN>>
[[TDxx024A]] <<DCXCUSN>>       [[TDxx021A]] <<DCXCUSN>>       [[TDxx041A]] <<DCXCUSN>>       [[TDxx022B]] <<DCXCUSN>>
[[TDxx023B]] <<DCXCUSN>>       [[TDxx024B]] <<DCXCUSN>>       [[TDxx021B]] <<DCXCUSN>>       [[TDxx041B]] <<DCXCUSN>>

Regards,
Larry

From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org<mailto:samuels at jlab.org>>
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 11:17 AM
To: Larry King <king at jlab.org<mailto:king at jlab.org>>
Subject: New DocuShare document routing task (Request): SNSPPU-CMA-REC-INSP-R1.docx

You have a new DocuShare document routing task:

Subject: SNSPPU-CMA-REC-INSP-R1.docx
Date: 04/19/2021 11:16:41

Due Date: 05/03/2021

To view your pending document routing tasks, click on the link below to login to DocuShare:

https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/routing/routing_email.jsp?url=request_base.jsp&routingSlipRequestID=17701&workFlowJobName=17695

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20210422/6370d1ec/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3481 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20210422/6370d1ec/attachment-0003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 97321 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20210422/6370d1ec/attachment-0004.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 35325 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20210422/6370d1ec/attachment-0005.png>