[Pansophy] AUPPS WCD Draft

[Naeem Huque]

Hi Tiffany,

I looked at the comments and the responses are below. In general, all of the the documents listed are already approved. Would they all need to be revised to match this document, or should the WCD be accurate as per the latest documents in Pansophy/Docushare?


  *
AUPPS-FAB-FLDANT-ASSY and AUPPS-FAB-INPANT-ASSY don't involve the brazing workcenter, and so Greg Grose isn't a relevant reviewer
  *
AUPPS-PROC-CRMC-INSP uses the CMM and Brazing workcenters, so Greg is a more relevant reviewer than Anne, since Aaron already represents CMM, and Greg is the brazing WCL.
  *   The inventory travelers are made by Mike and Calvin, and the PC/PM doesn't usually have much involvement in them. The current traveler reviewers in the WCD are the same ones as are in Pansophy. I could ask Mike to go and revise them all, but it would be a lot of unnecessary work considering that he's just adding himself as a second reviewer.

As a general note, a number of traveler and procedures have additional reviewers. Can the WCD have additional columns added, or could the template include additional columns?

Thanks,
Naeem
________________________________
From: Tiffany Ganey <ganey at jlab.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2024 4:46 PM
To: Naeem Huque <huque at jlab.org>
Cc: Ashley Mitchell <ashleya at jlab.org>; pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: RE: AUPPS WCD Draft


Hi Naeem –



I apologize for the delay in getting back to you on this.  Attached is a copy of the document you sent with my suggested edits/corrections.  The WCD Register should list who is the point of contact for that work at the current moment (so it should not list people that are no longer associated with that position – like Ashley and Scott).  Also the PE procedure does have requirements for who can be an Author/Reviewer 1/Reviewer 2/Project Rep.  In the purple font, you’ll see my suggested name changes so that the names are current and align with the current Project Execution procedure.  For the Leak Check Requirements document and the MSPR procedure, who the responsible person currently for these documents is outside of the scope of the AUPPS project, so I suggest that we leave those names blank.  You can use N/A or just grey out the cells.  I do like having them listed as I think it makes a more comprehensive list of what work control documents are required by AUPPS; however, I also want to avoid having a disconnect between who is listed in the AUPPS WCD Register and who is listed in actual procedure.  I also deleted the Template Approval tab since it is not needed for your Register.



Please let me know if you have any questions or if you’d like to discuss further.



Tiffany Ganey



From: Naeem Huque <huque at jlab.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2024 1:18 PM
To: Tiffany Ganey <ganey at jlab.org>
Cc: Ashley Mitchell <ashleya at jlab.org>; pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: AUPPS WCD Draft



Hi Tiffany,



My first run at the WCD is attached. Please take a look through and let me know if it can be sent out for signatures



Thanks,

Naeem



Naeem Huque

Staff Engineer

Superconducting Radiofrequency (SRF)

Jefferson Lab

12000 Jefferson Ave

Newport News

VA, 23606

Cell: 217-721-5422
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20240216/bddcbcbd/attachment.html>