[PEPPo] Urgent request for information

[Adeleke Adeyemi]

Any of the options work for me but like everyone else have states, we should differ to those who aren't here locally and of course the logistics on ground.
'Leke
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Paul Gueye <gueye at jlab.org> wrote:
>> Hi Joe,
>> 
>> I will be available for any time and will adjust my schedule accordingly. I
>> think the constraint is mainly from people who are offsite, especially our
>> French (and Italian!) collaborators. So I will support any option that will
>> be best for them, whether I prefer/like it or not. I am flexible. Most of
>> the prons/cons have already been addressed by Erica and Jean-Sebastien so
>> rather than commenting on the three options, I suggest we make a schedule
>> around their availabilities and make a plan based on that.
>> 
>> Paul
>> On Dec 14, 2011, at 17:34 55, Joe Grames wrote:
>> 
>> Dear PEPPo Collaborator,
>> 
>> Scheduling the PEPPo experiment during the 12MSD is a hot topic, in both the
>> good and bad sense.  It is a positive thing in the sense that the hard work
>> to install PEPPo and successfully defend the PAC proposal has put a
>> legitimate foot in the door to request this time.  It is bad, I believe,
>> only in the sense that scheduling the experiment during 12MSD is
>> logistically difficult.   A short time ago I presented to the 12MSD team our
>> beam and clock hour requirements, and now they are seeking to understand the
>> pros and cons of when (not if!) our experiment is scheduled.
>> 
>> There are likely three options that will be weighed against one another; a)
>> delaying 12MSD activities at the INJ/NL by 2-3 weeks to allow the full
>> experiment to occur beginning mid-May, b) postponing the experiment into the
>> Fall (September/October?) time frame w/ potentially less constraint on the
>> total number of days/shifts we can run, and c) a compromise of these two,
>> providing for a short commissioning run (days to a week) in mid-May, with
>> the balance of the run occurring later in the shutdown.
>> 
>> Although we are described as a hard working collaboration, we are indeed
>> small and staffing the experiment is a factor.  I realize this is short
>> notice, but can you please take a moment to send me a brief note detailing
>> your unavailability to participate in the experiment from May thru December
>> of 2012.  This can be teaching conflicts, unchangeable plans, terms of
>> service/contact that expire, etc.  Effectively, your availability to travel
>> to JLAB for extended period of time and perform the experiment.  In
>> addition, please comment on any other pros/cons which you believe impact
>> when the experiment might be performed.
>> 
>> You may reply to the entire collaboration list, but at a minimum please send
>> e-mail to myself and Eric.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Joe
>> _______________________________________________
>> PEPPo mailing list
>> PEPPo at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/peppo
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>  Paul Gueye
>> * Hampton University
>>   Physics Department
>>   Hampton, VA 23668
>>   W: (757) 727-5542
>>   F: (757) 728-6910
>>   E: paul.gueye at hamptonu.edu
>> * Jefferson Lab
>>   Physics Division - F382
>>   12000, Jefferson Avenue
>>   Newport News, VA 23606
>>   W: (757) 269-6287
>>   E: gueye at jlab.org
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PEPPo mailing list
>> PEPPo at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/peppo
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PEPPo mailing list
> PEPPo at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/peppo